NUJS Law Review
The Quarterly Flagship Journal of NUJS
Latest Articles
Volume 17 Issue 2 (2024)
Article
Private Enforcement of Competition Law: Revisiting the Legal Framework in India
by Mitali Jain & Nimesh Singh
Private enforcement is one of the lesser explored ways of enforcing competition law, wherein an entity is empowered to claim infringement of competition law and compensational remedies for the same. Although it is a popular practice in several jurisdictions, it has remained terribly underutilised in the competition law regime in India. The poor drafting of the provision, which entails establishment of a competition law infringement by an adjudicatory body as a precondition and requires calculation
Private Enforcement of Competition Law: Revisiting the Legal Framework in India
by Mitali Jain & Nimesh Singh
Private enforcement is one of the lesser explored ways of enforcing competition law, wherein an entity is empowered to claim infringement of competition law and compensational remedies for the same. Although it is a popular practice in several jurisdictions, it has remained terribly underutilised in the competition law regime in India. The poor drafting of the provision, which entails establishment of a competition law infringement by an adjudicatory body as a precondition and requires calculation
Article
Special Law, Regular Bail, Perverse Outcome? Assessing Judicial Prejudice in Bail Proceedings under the POCSO Act: Rajballav Prasad, Dharmander Singh, and the Delhi High Court
by Abhiram Nitin
The presumption of innocence is foundational to criminal law and must operate as a safeguard against prejudice during bail proceedings. However, the Indian Supreme Court has historically been inconsistent in clarifying the presumption's status as a right at bail, and has violated it in its bail jurisprudence, notably by prejudicially considering the seriousness of the alleged offence. Prejudice influenced by considerations of seriousness has also been explicitly legislated into the bail provisions of several of
Special Law, Regular Bail, Perverse Outcome? Assessing Judicial Prejudice in Bail Proceedings under the POCSO Act: Rajballav Prasad, Dharmander Singh, and the Delhi High Court
by Abhiram Nitin
The presumption of innocence is foundational to criminal law and must operate as a safeguard against prejudice during bail proceedings. However, the Indian Supreme Court has historically been inconsistent in clarifying the presumption's status as a right at bail, and has violated it in its bail jurisprudence, notably by prejudicially considering the seriousness of the alleged offence. Prejudice influenced by considerations of seriousness has also been explicitly legislated into the bail provisions of several of
Article
Preponderance of Probability and Presumptions of Guilt: Contextualising SEBI’s move towards Permissive Evidentiary Standards in Securities Regulation
by Sunandan Wadadekar & Mridul Anand
The Indian securities market is, of late, plagued by fraudulent activities such as insider trading and front running, exacerbated by technological advancements such as instant messaging. To combat the same, SEBI had often placed reliance on disconnected circumstantial evidence in regulatory investigations, with the Supreme Court’s progressive deference. However, recent Supreme Court verdicts have reverted to imposing a heavy burden of proof on the securities regulator. As a reactionary measure to these curbs, the SEBI
Preponderance of Probability and Presumptions of Guilt: Contextualising SEBI’s move towards Permissive Evidentiary Standards in Securities Regulation
by Sunandan Wadadekar & Mridul Anand
The Indian securities market is, of late, plagued by fraudulent activities such as insider trading and front running, exacerbated by technological advancements such as instant messaging. To combat the same, SEBI had often placed reliance on disconnected circumstantial evidence in regulatory investigations, with the Supreme Court’s progressive deference. However, recent Supreme Court verdicts have reverted to imposing a heavy burden of proof on the securities regulator. As a reactionary measure to these curbs, the SEBI
Article Archive
The NUJS Law Review operates on an open access model, making its articles freely available on its website and other sources.
Submissions
The NUJS Law Review is a quarterly publication and accepts submission on a rolling basis through the year.
Social Media
Find latest legal updates, along with updates about our events and publications
Citation Standard
The NUJS Law Review uses its propriety citation style for all submissions
NUJS Law Review Mentions
Justice D. Y. Chandrachud cites NUJS Law Review in his dissent in the judgement on the constitutional validity of Aadhar. He cites the article authored by Pratik Datta, Shefali Mehrotra and Shivangi Tyagi from Vol. 10(2) titled Judicial Review and Money Bills.
The Supreme Court of India has cited five articles published in NUJS Law Review in its historic judgement decriminalising homosexuality. The following authors have been cited with three articles being from the special issue of Vol. 2(3) - 1) Shamnad Basheer, Sroyon Mukherjee & Karthy Nair 2) Saptarshi Mandal 3) Tarunabh Khaitan 4) Robert Wintemute and, 5) Dipika Jain & Kimberly Rhoten.
Advocate Arvind Datar cites the NUJS Law Review article "Judicial Review and Money Bills" by Pratik Datta, Shefali Malhotra & Shivangi Tyagi to highlight that the judicial review of money bills is not precluded by virtue of the term "finality" in the matter pertaining to Aadhar as a money bill
The Ministry of Finance cites article by Rishad Ahmed Chowdhury in Volume 5 of the NUJS Law Review in the Economic Survey 2017 – 2018